On June 24, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board issued a proposed new joint standard for revenue recognition.
The core principle would require an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it receives, or expects to receive, in exchange for those goods or services.
To apply that principle, an entity would:
(a) identify the contract(s) with a customer;
(b) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract;
(c) determine the transaction price;
(d) allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations; and
(e) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies each performance obligation.
The proposals in this exposure draft are far reaching. A lot of discussion has centered on industries that will be significantly impacted like construction, software and telecom. However, all companies will be affected to some degree.
One area that will be different is how the issue of collectibility is handled. In determining the transaction price, an entity would be required to reduce the amount of promised consideration to reflect the customer’s credit risk.
Currently, SEC Codification of Staff Accounting Bulletins Topic 13, Revenue Recognition, requires collectibility to be reasonably assured before revenue is realized. Under the new exposure draft, collectibility would not directly affect the timing of revenue recognition but is considered in determining the transaction price, thus affecting how much can be recognized.
The requirement to reduce the amount of revenue recognized for the estimated portion that may be uncollectible includes situations in which an entity enters into contracts with customers and expects a proportion of them to default, but does not know which specific customers will default.
Implementation guidance in the exposure draft explains that if the entity enters into a group of similar contracts in which the promised consideration is required to be adjusted to reflect the customer’s credit risk, the entity might recognize revenue on an individual contract basis in the amount of the invoiced amount. The entity would then adjust the initial measurement of the receivables and recognize a corresponding reduction of revenue for the group of contracts.
How credit risk is handled is just one example of important changes proposed in this exposure draft. Accounting for warranties, sales with right of return, bill and hold arrangements, construction contracts, contract costs and licensing arrangements are some other examples.
Have you had a chance to study the Exposure Draft Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Revenue from Contracts with Customers? What do you think about the proposals?

Revenue Recognition and Customer Credit Risk
The price if transaction can be included with the reference of exchange fluctuations, of two currencies involved one for international trade other for accounting of the entity.
The collectibility of transaction price , which is first to be booked with the sale invoice rendered to the customer to effect the inventory used for sale, a customer who is a third is responsible for such legal transaction and is bound by the terms of sales and such goods shown as sales are not parted with other purpose. How the measurement of collectibility is to be handled, like , there is tax shield, which in Pakistan , is required for the collectibles, if they are old by three years or more can be made provision against. The Advisory task will be to give governance of the Sales and corresponding Collectibles recording in the entity’s books of account as per transaction occurred on the basis of sale contract and/or invoice. The transaction price should be a regular price as with all the customers, or discount price, if used, are as per company’s rule, or comforted in the transaction according to management’s approval. Similar amount as Collectibles is be recognized for goods taken as Sales. The Advisory may think, that , sales are made but there are substantially less collections, may be entity, has serviced their goods to be sold to the party-in-interest, to transfer the benefits of the entity to the other party. The Advisory give check to the entity that equal amount of dispatches of the goods, which has decreased the inventory, is to be correspondingly reported, by the transaction document as sale invoice in the collectible account too, which is recognition of revenue. If there is an estimate that collections are not likely to be realized in full , it should be provided against as doubtful or unrecovered , to reduce the collectible accounts to adjust the customer credit risk.
Rashid Pervez
92-0333-2238406
9221-34821075
ACIS,PFA, CA (finalist), ACMA (finalist), Member IIA- Karachi Chapter- Pakistan
Posted by: Rashid Pervez | September 01, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Hey,
Loving your blog, awesome tips on this you have here. I would just like to ask you some questions privately, mind contacting me at
sales@logoforcompany.com
Posted by: company logo design | August 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM
It’s rather awesome,I have been searching materials relate to these stuffs for my
paper.and it really helps me.Thank you.
Posted by: prada handbags | August 13, 2010 at 01:39 AM
Hi!
I find this article relevent to one of my posts. I added your link to my blog. Hope you don't mind. Here's my link just incase you want to review its appropriateness.
http://cpa-review-free.blogspot.com/
Posted by: cpa review | July 26, 2010 at 11:34 AM