Many have expressed support for a move to one set of high-quality global accounting standards. Leaders of the Group of 20 nations have called for significant progress towards this goal. President Obama in recently released plans for regulatory reforms called for substantial progress to be made in 2009. A large number of public comment letters to the SEC regarding its IFRS roadmap expressed support for global standards.
While many support the goal, there is disagreement on how to get there. Some believe the Financial Accounting Standards Board should focus on convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. Others believe that adoption of IFRS is the best solution. Recently, the Federation of European Accountants (FEE) introduced a new wrinkle to the debate. The organization issued a policy statement recommending that the International Accounting Standards Board drop its convergence program with the U.S., and focus on issues that are more urgent.
Although IFRS adoption in the U.S. is in a holding pattern, IFRS adoption in other countries marches on. In the end, we face two likely scenarios. Either the U.S. ultimately adopts IFRS or both IFRS and U.S. GAAP coexist (converged or not). Under both scenarios, it will be important for U.S. CPAs to build foundational knowledge of IFRS.
Recognizing this need, IFRS questions will be incorporated into the CPA exam no later than 2012. Colleges are incorporating IFRS into their accounting curricula and accounting textbooks with IFRS content are expected in the reasonably near future.
If college and the exam are in the rearview mirror, the need to be bilingual in both U.S. GAAP and IFRS will be important for many financial professionals in the future. While a CPA today may work exclusively in US GAAP, their next opportunity may be with a company or client that uses IFRS. For those that work for foreign owned companies, chances are they are proficient today. For those that work with U.S. multinationals, developing IFRS proficiency may be an important career-expanding decision.
How important do you believe being bilingual in U.S. GAAP and IFRS will be in the future?

Everyone has his personal judgment to 1 thing. And I concur with you. You are so wonderful at writting and I like you write-up punish within your blog. It is pretty helpful for me. out of your write-up i understand we have to see his benefit as well as to determine his disadvantage.
Posted by: air jordan shoes cheap | September 04, 2010 at 03:11 AM
While a CPA today may work exclusively in US GAAP, their next opportunity may be with a company or client that uses IFRS. For those that work for foreign owned companies, chances are they are proficient today. http://www.fullmediafire.com
Posted by: Randall | August 31, 2010 at 12:47 AM
I am a US CPA seconded in Asia and about half of my client were on IFRS or have done an implementation this year. I had no previous exposure to IFRS previously, only USGAAP. I was pleasantly surprised that IFRS and US GAAP are more similar than they are different, and the IFRS guidance is much easier to navigate and understand. Looking forward to convergence between the two and becoming more of an expert that can help me leverage my skill set when I return to the states.
http://www.fullmediafire.com
Posted by: Kerry | August 28, 2010 at 04:06 AM
Yes, I agree this comment. When I opened this site, I feel very comfortable to learn this knowledge. Next time I will face any problem and any found details than I will go to on this site.
Posted by: Miu Miu bags | August 23, 2010 at 01:21 AM
Yeah!! You have made a point. I totally agree with you.
Posted by: Marc Jacobs bag | August 23, 2010 at 01:18 AM
Nice, provocative post and very interesting Blog. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Burberry bag | August 23, 2010 at 01:16 AM
While a CPA today may work exclusively in US GAAP, their next opportunity may be with a company or client that uses IFRS. For those that work for foreign owned companies, chances are they are proficient today.
Posted by: gucci Handbags | August 23, 2010 at 12:34 AM
It’s rather awesome,I have been searching materials relate to these stuffs for my
paper.and it really helps me.Thank you.
Posted by: prada handbags | August 13, 2010 at 02:03 AM
It’s rather awesome,I have been searching materials relate to these stuffs for my
paper.and it really helps me.Thank you.
Posted by: prada handbags | August 13, 2010 at 01:45 AM
The hockey stick chart party is over and it is time to get back to the basics; GAAP and appropriate independent roles of financial responsibility. Please help by learning to speak a second language and reaching out to make the world a safer place for Capitalism and GAAP.
Posted by: rosetta stone | August 05, 2010 at 11:18 PM
yes of course, since English not my common language, but I know English.
Posted by: business goals | July 24, 2010 at 01:01 AM
Whatever we do, we should think twice, then things will be better than past. As the proverb says: all things are difficult before they are easy.
Posted by: Nike Shox R4 | July 14, 2010 at 02:03 AM
There is no doubt that GAAP faithful are out numbered in a count physical bodies. In order to converge in a meaningful way, the Glass-Steagall segregation of duties must be restored in America's financial regulatory realm. If we do not restore the separation of the insurance, banking, brokering, and investment banking roles, we are destined to perpetuate chaos, fraud, corruption, ponzi schemes, pay-to-play, and other non-value added economic relationships.
http://pencilsharpenerelectric.com/
Posted by: Causes Of Divorce | July 05, 2010 at 02:11 PM
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: vibram five fingers | June 05, 2010 at 07:16 PM
Just tell ourself that we are the best one. We will success depend on working hard. Believe that time will change everything. Fighting.
Posted by: Jordan Retro 12 | June 03, 2010 at 08:41 PM
Always in a complicated way study new language
Posted by: algeria dating | May 25, 2010 at 06:07 AM
You write good articles, I will always be concerned about
Posted by: rosetta stone | May 24, 2010 at 06:08 PM
Do some searches on IFRS.com and on the internet, you will find a number of them. As the move to IFRS gains momentum, more IFRS training specifically developed for tax professionals will likely be developed.
Posted by: nike shox | May 18, 2010 at 11:06 PM
The loan seem to be useful for guys, which are willing to start their own organization. In fact, it's not really hard to receive a student loan.
Posted by: LynneMcknight | April 08, 2010 at 01:25 AM
But for me I would say that having convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards is the best solution.
Posted by: aion kinah | February 20, 2010 at 11:28 PM
"While many support the goal, there is disagreement on how to get there. Some believe the Financial Accounting Standards Board should focus on convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. Others believe that adoption of IFRS is the best solution. "
But for me I would say that having convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards is the best solution.
Posted by: OAKDALE Ca Homes | January 13, 2010 at 06:28 PM
Since I'm a CPA that has an experience with IFRS and technology, and this topic seems to call for multilingual approach, I would like to sensitize my accounting brethren to XBRL (and UTF-8 and Unicode by extension). You may start seeing those as drivers from the technology point of view. So, IFRS may mean nothing to a programmer, but Unicode certainly means a lot or just may be another side of the same coin.
Posted by: gm | August 07, 2009 at 10:08 AM
I am a US CPA seconded in Asia and about half of my client were on IFRS or have done an implementation this year. I had no previous exposure to IFRS previously, only USGAAP. I was pleasantly surprised that IFRS and US GAAP are more similar than they are different, and the IFRS guidance is much easier to navigate and understand. Looking forward to convergence between the two and becoming more of an expert that can help me leverage my skill set when I return to the states.
Posted by: J Johnson | August 04, 2009 at 08:29 PM
In response to Marc’s question regarding training for tax professionals…..U.S. tax accountants are trained with a foundation of knowledge in US GAAP. A move to IFRS will require a broad understanding of the new set of standards. With this understanding, tax professionals will better understand pre-tax differences between IFRS and GAAP and can assess how the move will affect their clients and companies. It will be important for tax practitioners to develop that foundation of IFRS knowledge, so many existing IFRS courses focused accounting and financial reporting are just as important for tax practitioners.
A number of whitepapers and articles have been written about how IFRS will affect tax planning and compliance. Do some searches on IFRS.com and on the internet, you will find a number of them. As the move to IFRS gains momentum, more IFRS training specifically developed for tax professionals will likely be developed.
Posted by: Paul Parks | August 04, 2009 at 08:17 AM
Learning a new language is hard. Common, and disappointing, themes emerged from the SEC roadmap comment letters. To paraphrase -
“We think that a global set of accounting standards is a great idea, but why can’t they use ours?”
“US GAAP is more mature than IFRS and that’s why it is more complex – IFRS will surely develop more rules as it matures and we’ll be back where we started”
These themes ignore reality. With China moving to IFRS (and all of Europe there already ) the debate about whose standards are ‘best’ is over.
To assume IFRS will develop along the lines of US GAAP shows how little understanding there is currently of a principles based system. The IASB board members, in their webcast meetings, are rigorous about distinguishing between principles and rules and a great deal of effort goes into distilling standards down to their essential principles. Application of those principles requires rigorous analysis of transactions, and flexible thinking, but ultimately a principles system is more robust than a rules based one, which forever plays catch-up.
US accountants are used to learning and applying rules. IFRS requires different skills. A first step is learning the IFRS standards, but those accountants who develop the ability to think flexibly, argue by analogy, and determine underlying economic substance will have a competitive advantage going forward.
Posted by: anne-marie johnson | August 04, 2009 at 06:24 AM