« IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities | Main | Waiting on the SEC. »

July 24, 2009

Comments

air jordan shoes cheap

Everyone has his personal judgment to 1 thing. And I concur with you. You are so wonderful at writting and I like you write-up punish within your blog. It is pretty helpful for me. out of your write-up i understand we have to see his benefit as well as to determine his disadvantage.

Randall

While a CPA today may work exclusively in US GAAP, their next opportunity may be with a company or client that uses IFRS. For those that work for foreign owned companies, chances are they are proficient today. http://www.fullmediafire.com

Kerry

I am a US CPA seconded in Asia and about half of my client were on IFRS or have done an implementation this year. I had no previous exposure to IFRS previously, only USGAAP. I was pleasantly surprised that IFRS and US GAAP are more similar than they are different, and the IFRS guidance is much easier to navigate and understand. Looking forward to convergence between the two and becoming more of an expert that can help me leverage my skill set when I return to the states.
http://www.fullmediafire.com

Miu Miu bags

Yes, I agree this comment. When I opened this site, I feel very comfortable to learn this knowledge. Next time I will face any problem and any found details than I will go to on this site.

Marc Jacobs bag

Yeah!! You have made a point. I totally agree with you.

Burberry bag

Nice, provocative post and very interesting Blog. Hope it will always be alive!

gucci Handbags

While a CPA today may work exclusively in US GAAP, their next opportunity may be with a company or client that uses IFRS. For those that work for foreign owned companies, chances are they are proficient today.

prada handbags

It’s rather awesome,I have been searching materials relate to these stuffs for my

paper.and it really helps me.Thank you.

prada handbags

It’s rather awesome,I have been searching materials relate to these stuffs for my

paper.and it really helps me.Thank you.

rosetta stone

The hockey stick chart party is over and it is time to get back to the basics; GAAP and appropriate independent roles of financial responsibility. Please help by learning to speak a second language and reaching out to make the world a safer place for Capitalism and GAAP.

business goals

yes of course, since English not my common language, but I know English.

Nike Shox R4

Whatever we do, we should think twice, then things will be better than past. As the proverb says: all things are difficult before they are easy.

Causes Of Divorce

There is no doubt that GAAP faithful are out numbered in a count physical bodies. In order to converge in a meaningful way, the Glass-Steagall segregation of duties must be restored in America's financial regulatory realm. If we do not restore the separation of the insurance, banking, brokering, and investment banking roles, we are destined to perpetuate chaos, fraud, corruption, ponzi schemes, pay-to-play, and other non-value added economic relationships.
http://pencilsharpenerelectric.com/

vibram five fingers

It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.

Jordan Retro 12

Just tell ourself that we are the best one. We will success depend on working hard. Believe that time will change everything. Fighting.

algeria dating

Always in a complicated way study new language

rosetta stone

You write good articles, I will always be concerned about

nike shox

Do some searches on IFRS.com and on the internet, you will find a number of them. As the move to IFRS gains momentum, more IFRS training specifically developed for tax professionals will likely be developed.

LynneMcknight

The loan seem to be useful for guys, which are willing to start their own organization. In fact, it's not really hard to receive a student loan.

aion kinah

But for me I would say that having convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards is the best solution.

OAKDALE  Ca Homes

"While many support the goal, there is disagreement on how to get there. Some believe the Financial Accounting Standards Board should focus on convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. Others believe that adoption of IFRS is the best solution. "

But for me I would say that having convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards is the best solution.

gm

Since I'm a CPA that has an experience with IFRS and technology, and this topic seems to call for multilingual approach, I would like to sensitize my accounting brethren to XBRL (and UTF-8 and Unicode by extension). You may start seeing those as drivers from the technology point of view. So, IFRS may mean nothing to a programmer, but Unicode certainly means a lot or just may be another side of the same coin.

J Johnson

I am a US CPA seconded in Asia and about half of my client were on IFRS or have done an implementation this year. I had no previous exposure to IFRS previously, only USGAAP. I was pleasantly surprised that IFRS and US GAAP are more similar than they are different, and the IFRS guidance is much easier to navigate and understand. Looking forward to convergence between the two and becoming more of an expert that can help me leverage my skill set when I return to the states.

Paul Parks

In response to Marc’s question regarding training for tax professionals…..U.S. tax accountants are trained with a foundation of knowledge in US GAAP. A move to IFRS will require a broad understanding of the new set of standards. With this understanding, tax professionals will better understand pre-tax differences between IFRS and GAAP and can assess how the move will affect their clients and companies. It will be important for tax practitioners to develop that foundation of IFRS knowledge, so many existing IFRS courses focused accounting and financial reporting are just as important for tax practitioners.

A number of whitepapers and articles have been written about how IFRS will affect tax planning and compliance. Do some searches on IFRS.com and on the internet, you will find a number of them. As the move to IFRS gains momentum, more IFRS training specifically developed for tax professionals will likely be developed.

anne-marie johnson

Learning a new language is hard. Common, and disappointing, themes emerged from the SEC roadmap comment letters. To paraphrase -
“We think that a global set of accounting standards is a great idea, but why can’t they use ours?”
“US GAAP is more mature than IFRS and that’s why it is more complex – IFRS will surely develop more rules as it matures and we’ll be back where we started”

These themes ignore reality. With China moving to IFRS (and all of Europe there already ) the debate about whose standards are ‘best’ is over.

To assume IFRS will develop along the lines of US GAAP shows how little understanding there is currently of a principles based system. The IASB board members, in their webcast meetings, are rigorous about distinguishing between principles and rules and a great deal of effort goes into distilling standards down to their essential principles. Application of those principles requires rigorous analysis of transactions, and flexible thinking, but ultimately a principles system is more robust than a rules based one, which forever plays catch-up.

US accountants are used to learning and applying rules. IFRS requires different skills. A first step is learning the IFRS standards, but those accountants who develop the ability to think flexibly, argue by analogy, and determine underlying economic substance will have a competitive advantage going forward.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment